Ship Design CONSIDERATIONS
If thinking about getting Oilers
back underway - NOT the thought here.
1. Fresh water
- always seems to be in short supply at the site of any of these
disasters. The Oilers could easily be configured to carry a
million gallons or more of potable water. Also need some new technology
desalinization plants to make more water. The retired oiler
evaporators can hardly keep up with her own steam leaks.
2.
Cargo types: adding side doors and converting the formerly liquid
cargo tanks into a sort of "RO-RO" support ship. This requires a
lot of expensive design and engineering, but it is do-able. Designers
might also look at deck cargo (coastal disaster relief typically
requires building materials, small boats, landing barges, trucks,
ambulances, etc. etc. that would constitute deck cargo). But the
Oiler's are not strong on handling deck cargo. The winches take
up most of the deck space. Might want to "clear the decks" and
start over with just a couple of moderate-to-heavy lift cranes.
3.
Airlift support. When clearing the decks the designer might want
to make a big helopad either way forward or way aft - but then there is
the problem of getting cargo to those pads.
The big limiting factor I see,
however, is the basic steam propulsion plant. The Oiler's were
never "turn key" plants. They are cranky and high
maintenance. The likelihood of going from extended "cold iron" to
underway would be weeks, not days or hours. They are also
manpower intense and incredible fuel hogs. Even inport steaming
consumes a tremendous amount of fuel. They only way that these
hulls could be dependable and economical "start and go" ships would be
to convert to low speed diesel w/ huge hotel service diesel electric
generators as well.
So. . . even assuming that the
hulls are still sound, the engineering and design expense for
converting to some sort of RO-RO, plus deck modifications, plus fresh
water modifications plus complete repowering. The concept of
spending hundreds of millions on hardware that would then "just sit
there" until needed for humanitarian relief might be a hard sell.
Just look at the "Mercy Ships", a christian medical mission
organization that currently has two ships (one still being fitted
out). "www.mercyships.org". There ships are in use
24/7/365 and still very difficult to support.
The US Navy (MSC) bought seven Sea
Land shipping "SL-7" container ships back in the late 1970's.
These ships were practically brand new "super high speed" container
ships designed to make regular runs between the US Atlantic coast and
Europe at 30+ knots. They were powered by huge steam turbines
(100,000+ HP). They started to enter service about the time of
the 1973 oil embargo. When oil prices went through the roof these
ships stopped sailing because of high operating costs. The navy
bought them for a song and turned them into "RO-RO" ships for the pre
positioned force. They were huge (almost 1,000 feet long) , fast
and cheap. These seven ships could deliver more cargo from the US
to the Persian Gulf in 11 days than all the airlift in the free world
could deliver in 64 days. Their operating cost was not a factor
because the US Department of Defense was footing the bill. They
have truly earned their keep and proved the concept during both gulf
wars. They are tremendous.
Lary
7-3-2006